Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:28 pm
How do you define a hologram, daniel, in the context of the quote posted on your Facebook? Discussions of Holograms tend to have illusory connotations. A scary thing to mix into a scientific discussion involving reality. I know that is not the case -- RS is derived from natural consequences. But it is important to understand what separates your understanding of RS2 holographics from the virtual understanding of holographics we may have. Can you please expand on the subject?
daniel wrote:If you've read my papers, then you know my motto is, "everything you know is backwards." People now think we live in an artificial reality, because we can simulate Nature with computer programs. But... it's backwards. What has happened is that our ability to emulate nature has gotten so good--we've actually DISCOVERED how Nature works--"reality" IS a hologram. So you don't want to collapse the hologram, as Reality will go with it! But what you DO want to do is to understand HOW the hologram works, so that you can learn to alter it--much like "calling for the Arch" on the Holodecks of Star Trek. Or, if you prefer Harry Potter--magick is the science of controlling the hologram. And that is where RS2, the reevaluation of the Reciprocal System comes in.