How Can Anyone Take David Wilcock Seriously?

For general discussion of topics that don't have a specific theme, questions or suggestions for research.

Moderator: daniel

User avatar
IrieLion
Inquirer
Inquirer
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:31 am

How Can Anyone Take David Wilcock Seriously?

Post by IrieLion » Wed Oct 30, 2013 12:17 pm

- Claims to be Edgar Cayce
- Literally claims to be the 'Father Of The White Race'
- Has nothing but failed predictions.
- Vetted Drake And Told Us He Was The Real Deal

He told us about the his 2012 I Told Ya So Party. Obviously that was a total bust. David Wilcock and Ben Fulford for years keep telling us the current enslavement system known as world governments will fall 'soon' and a golden age will ensue. This is the general theme of telling people what they want to hear. There is little if not any evidence in the real world to back up what he writes in his updates. He also claimed back around 2009 that Obama was going to have a 2 hour primetime live TV special where he would introduce us to a few alien species. That must have happened on another time line or something. :)
His unwavering support for the puppet Obama is also nauseating. I admit, I have not read any of his books. Why would I when I have enough of his free material to determine he is wrong about most things except the obvious. Also I have tried to check into some of his scientific claims where he references obscure Soviet era scientific papers which I can never find.

What bothers me is this... David does seem articulate and intelligent. How can someone who appears intelligent seem so naïve at the same time? Does he really believe his own bs, or is he now just become a common con man and making a career out of giving people what they want to hear, which seems to be mostly fantasy at this point.

User avatar
Lozion
Adept
Adept
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:32 am
Location: Changes all the time..

Re: How Can Anyone Take David Wilcock Seriously?

Post by Lozion » Wed Oct 30, 2013 4:22 pm

Hence me & many other on this forum I'm sure not reading him anymore, look for Daniel's comments on a few threads about David not using valid intel he is given, indicating Wilcock will only touch on subjects he selects to further his diatribes…

Btw, notice how a lot of Truth Movement bloggers are losing credibility lately? Wilcock, Fulford, Keenan, Zap/Poof, Drake, Alex Jones, etc.

Its really as if with consciousness expanding, (lizard) scales are literally falling off our eyes… :) :mrgreen:

Guidance,
In rapport we thrive, in rivalry we strive.

User avatar
Lozion
Adept
Adept
Posts: 473
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:32 am
Location: Changes all the time..

Re: How Can Anyone Take David Wilcock Seriously?

Post by Lozion » Wed Oct 30, 2013 4:33 pm

Oh, add this bozo to the list as well…

http://2012portal.blogspot.com/2013/10/ ... mment-form
In rapport we thrive, in rivalry we strive.

neal
Seeker
Seeker
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 4:05 pm

Re: How Can Anyone Take David Wilcock Seriously?

Post by neal » Wed Oct 30, 2013 6:10 pm

So, all the worlds are staged, and every broadcast has a hidden angle. Guidance, better trust whatever instincts are brave enough to punch through. There is a damned War raging, cons and marks, and harvest. Watch the clouds, and the wind.

That will not save, but there is the clarity. There is no one out there uncompromised, the ones watching are sealed up, just letting this stuff do what it will do. There is kind of a vast gulf, used to be traveled often, that let stuff go back and forth. This is the place where squeezing is the order of the day.

Timelines are subject to evolutionary pressures. It is hard to fix when the loss exceeds the promise. Jesus wept.

User avatar
Djchrismac
Adept
Adept
Posts: 410
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:38 pm
Location: Glasgow
Contact:

Re: How Can Anyone Take David Wilcock Seriously?

Post by Djchrismac » Thu Oct 31, 2013 3:56 am

IrieLion wrote:What bothers me is this... David does seem articulate and intelligent. How can someone who appears intelligent seem so naïve at the same time? Does he really believe his own bs, or is he now just become a common con man and making a career out of giving people what they want to hear, which seems to be mostly fantasy at this point.
I think David has been hijacked and is being used to promote hidden agenda's. I like a lot of his work, it put me onto Daniel and Bruce's material in the first place, but anyone that ignores information in favour of his version of things and doesn't look at everything is suspect. I see he has taken to posting comments after Fulford's posts now and is still saying the same stuff, that Obama and the dragons will save the day!

I think he's genuine to a point but has lost his way and believes fully in ascension happening but is being used as a pawn in the big game to help guide us down the wrong path. Ken's posts on the Redefining God blog have him and the ICP sussed...
Jones: [looks at Sallah] You said their headpiece only had markings on one side, are you absolutely sure? [Sallah nods] Belloq's staff is too long.
Jones and Sallah: They're digging in the wrong place!

soldierhugsmember
Adept
Adept
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:32 pm

Re: How Can Anyone Take David Wilcock Seriously?

Post by soldierhugsmember » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:37 am

Lozion wrote:Oh, add this bozo to the list as well…

http://2012portal.blogspot.com/2013/10/ ... mment-form
Oh pay no attention to Cobra.
That's the trouble with disinfo agents - they give you a lot of truth but every now and again, they slip a lethal dose of poison in once they got you used to taking in their stuff.

soldierhugsmember
Adept
Adept
Posts: 467
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:32 pm

Re: How Can Anyone Take David Wilcock Seriously?

Post by soldierhugsmember » Fri Nov 01, 2013 9:42 am

I could be wrong here but my feeling is that a person needs to be humble in what he does. Even if what you are doing is something so big that it affects the whole world, your attitude should be that you are only in that position because you are a conduit for a greater force, not because you are so great. Sort of like you are the glove, not the hand. Once you start thinking you're the hand, you've lost it.

User avatar
daniel
Professor
Professor
Posts: 878
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:33 pm
Location: P3X-774
Contact:

Re: How Can Anyone Take David Wilcock Seriously?

Post by daniel » Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:08 am

IrieLion wrote:- Literally claims to be the 'Father Of The White Race'
I missed that one; must be something new.
IrieLion wrote:- Has nothing but failed predictions.
Back in 2005, he did change his website from "ascension2012" to "divinecosmos" -- so technically, he predicted that nothing would happen in 2012! :)
IrieLion wrote:Also I have tried to check into some of his scientific claims where he references obscure Soviet era scientific papers which I can never find.
The Russian work on torsion fields and DNA is real--I've read his printouts from the Internet, back in 2005.
IrieLion wrote:What bothers me is this... David does seem articulate and intelligent. How can someone who appears intelligent seem so naïve at the same time? Does he really believe his own bs, or is he now just become a common con man and making a career out of giving people what they want to hear, which seems to be mostly fantasy at this point.
In psychology, the condition is known as the hyperinflation of the ego. It does not indicate any bad intent (like a con man) or mind control, just that the ego complex has subsumed the Self (ethics) and has become the dominant complex in the psyche. Since the main function of the ego is survival, it will do whatever it needs to do to maintain that status. You can see this in all these journalists/presenters... to paraphrase an old saying, "the messenger has become more important than the message." This is obvious in David, as well as others, by just looking at the font sizes on the cover of his new book--attention is drawn to the largest text size, so what is the first thing that catches your eye with his latest book? Message or messenger?
Power out? Let's see if many hands can make the lights work.
Facebook: daniel.phoenixiii

User avatar
IrieLion
Inquirer
Inquirer
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:31 am

Re: How Can Anyone Take David Wilcock Seriously?

Post by IrieLion » Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:26 pm

daniel wrote:
IrieLion wrote:- Literally claims to be the 'Father Of The White Race'
I missed that one; must be something new.
Go to 43:55 in this video and start listening, He literally says, 'I'm your daddy'. Now this isn't the only time he said it. I believe he said it in a camelot interview but I don't have the time to track it down. In that one he says something like, 'If you are white, then I'm your daddy.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEyqT2_ricA#t=2647


Cayce is said to be an incarnation of Ra, father of the white race and an Egyptian deity. More recently, David Wilcock claims to be the present incarnation of Ra.

http://friendshipagenda.com/members/pro ... s_478.html
daniel wrote:
IrieLion wrote:- Has nothing but failed predictions.
Back in 2005, he did change his website from "ascension2012" to "divinecosmos" -- so technically, he predicted that nothing would happen in 2012! :)
I can't find David's original comment about his 2012 I Told Ya So Party. I think he took that post down. But it may still be there in one of his article from 2012. He certainly did make it seem like a joke in that paper as he says below. But he tries to pass it off as a joke here. It's not just this one reference to a party, he consistently feeds people HOPE PORN that around the corner the golden age will start. Here he his doing some damage control about it

The "romance" of the Mayan Calendar end-date was that "everything" would happen on that one day. The 2012 crop circle certainly helped give me that impression.
I made a joke in the 2012 Enigma video -- "see you at the I-told-ya-so party in 2013" -- and a lot of people are all upset about that now.
I did, honestly, think that we might see this happen right around that very day -- like "the striking of the clock upon the hour."
However, as we got closer and closer to that all-important date last year, I grew increasingly concerned about it.

http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davi ... ncereality
daniel wrote:
IrieLion wrote:Also I have tried to check into some of his scientific claims where he references obscure Soviet era scientific papers which I can never find.
The Russian work on torsion fields and DNA is real--I've read his printouts from the Internet, back in 2005.
I wasn't talking about the torsion field research, which is by probably the most researched and credible of his Russian paper references. I'm talking about references he makes to other Russian research. One example is when David talks about transferring DNA from one embryo to the next of two different species via a laser and having the second embryo develop as a cross between both species. There are others but I cannot remember them now.

daniel wrote: In psychology, the condition is known as the hyperinflation of the ego. It does not indicate any bad intent (like a con man) or mind control, just that the ego complex has subsumed the Self (ethics) and has become the dominant complex in the psyche. Since the main function of the ego is survival, it will do whatever it needs to do to maintain that status. You can see this in all these journalists/presenters... to paraphrase an old saying, "the messenger has become more important than the message." This is obvious in David, as well as others, by just looking at the font sizes on the cover of his new book--attention is drawn to the largest text size, so what is the first thing that catches your eye with his latest book? Message or messenger?

AGREED 100%. Daniel you are presenting us with revolutionary information. I LOVE this site and your papers. It all really makes a lot of sense and RS theory is just beautiful at explaining how things really work. David was quite frankly lucky to have had the chance to exchange information with you years ago. He may have all the best intentions in the world but I think he is heading down the wrong path and its apparent his ego is not helping. You on the other hand seem very humble and it shows. You seem way more spiritually advanced than David. I know it's only fair that you reference David and give him credit where credit is due (though I've only seen a small reference here or there). I'd hate for people who haven't discovered you yet to see the name 'Wilcock' on your site and then just instantly tune out. I've actually already seen this happen a couple of times. There are some intelligent people out there that aren't giving your amazing work a chance because of a couple of small references to David, and that is a shame. They would be amazed if they read your papers.

User avatar
deepfsh
Mage
Mage
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 10:30 am

Re: How Can Anyone Take David Wilcock Seriously?

Post by deepfsh » Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:57 pm

IrieLion wrote:- Literally claims to be the 'Father Of The White Race'
daniel wrote:I missed that one; must be something new.
Watch his 2012 Event Horizon lecture, minute 42:49, and you'll find that quote ("I'm your daddy"). But you must take into consideration the context in which it was said, namely him maybe being Cayce's reincarnation and Cayce supposedly being the reincarnation of some Ra-Ta, a supposed hybrid (earthly mother, ET father) ... he was showing the article All blue-eyed people can be traced back to one ancestor who lived 10,000 years ago near the Black Sea.

Speaking about synchronicities ... if you look at the above mentioned article, you can see that among the famous blue-eyed people mentioned by the journalist there is also a picture of Daniel Craig. When Daniel mentioned that David looks more like Rasputin, I found a guy who wrote a very interesting article about this issue, and among other things he wrote is that Cayce has reincarnated as... guess who? Mr Bond himself! :) While Cayce's wife has supposedly reincarnated as Eva Green, the actress who played with Craig in Casino Royale in 2006.

What a ride ...
"You talk the talk ... do you walk the walk?" Kubrick, Full Metal Jacket

Post Reply