Sorry I somehow never bumped into this thread... and I see that it has been a year! Didn't realize you had asked me personally Chris, will answer now.
I wouldn't blame them... The temperament of looking at video footage, pics, etc. is that which also gets easily distracted with visuals, and is easily very lost without visuals. And RS is not so easily "visualisable" because we are looking at the entire visible world at once! My posts there were, and are still, more of an experiment, to see what it's possible to communicate.Djchrismac wrote:Good effort Gopi, unfortunately your attempts to educate about the RS got very quickly ignored and buried. There was also a brief mention of Larson's papers on a Nuke Hoax topic and Gopi did a great post on the Hegalian Dialectic but only a couple of posters seemed to bother reading Larson's work and again it wasn't well received.
I know Simon personally, and I have also spoken to his close friend Hoi (Max) on the phone a few times. They are decent folk, with the usual personality quirks that all of us have. Simon is highly energetic and enthusiastic in person, and throws all his energy into his projects. Hoi is far more cool-headed, and is a good friend of Simon. Regardless of what their actual effect on these murky routes of research is, I think they are both well-meaning.Djchrismac wrote:Gopi, what are your thoughts on Shack and the Clues forum? Personally I think they have muddied the waters by not properly discussing topics, getting to the point where they now believe that absolutely everything is fake... which is a pretty good psyop when you look at it that way.
As to the forum itself, it is very abrasive there at times, especially because of lack of awareness of the forum as a medium. It is very easy to post something online, so unless there is a spiritual path or understanding of the cosmic sector or Other Side of the world, it is very easy to lose balance. That is one of the pitfalls of being excessively glued to the material sector for understanding, such as video fakery alone. But that is just a decision they have made on that forum, to keep things restricted to fakery in general, and the tenor of the forum is a consequence of that. Still overall, the forum is a valuable contribution, and more sincere than most.
As for the thing of calling everything a fake, you must realize that without transitioning to the Other side, where one can see manipulation at several levels, with the corresponding motivations and so on, manipulation is seen only as fakery. I would replace "fakery" with "manipulation", and then the whole thing will make more sense. I would agree that over the centuries, almost everything we encounter on a daily basis has been 'touched' by the curse of manipulation, but not all that is touched that way is necessarily fake. It does take a lot of separating wheat from the chaff, and in my case, a lot of patience too!